Publications by rOpenSci - open tools for open science

ὕδωρ + σκοπῶ = water + observe

02.04.2018

Hydrology is a concept to unify statistics, data analysis and numerical models in order to understand and analyze the endless circulation of water between the earth and its atmosphere. That’s a lot alike Data Science, isn’t it? Hydrologic Processes evolve in space and time, are extremely complex and we may never comprehend them. For this rea...

4657 sym R (3099 sym/10 pcs) 4 img

Where is the value in package peer review?

05.04.2018

If you read my reflection #1 on rOpenSci Onboarding, then you know I see value in the Onboarding process. A LOT of value even. This post is about where that value lies. This question has important corollaries which I will explore here based on my experience as a reviewer of bowerbird: How is a package peer reviewer’s time best spent? When is t...

6571 sym 2 img

Forcing Yourself to Make Your Life Easier

11.04.2018

The general struggle Something that will make life easier in the long-run can be the most difficult thing to do today. For coders, prioritising the long term may involve an overhaul of current practice and the learning of a new skill. This can be painful for a number of reasons: We have to admit to ourselves that we’ve been doing things ineffi...

8837 sym

.rprofile: Noam Ross

12.04.2018

Dr. Noam Ross [@noamross on Twitter] is a disease ecologist at EcoHealth Alliance in NYC, as well as an editor for rOpenSci. Topics of discussion included Noam’s history with R and rOpenSci, working in a team-driven research environment, and inspirations for pushing research processes and rOpenSci projects in exciting new directions. KO: What ...

9866 sym 2 img

The 2018 author and reviewer survey

16.04.2018

rOpenSci’s package review system (aka onboarding) is one of our key activities to improve quality and sustainability of scientific R packages. The editorial team are constantly working towards improving the experience for both authors and reviewers. After our first year, we surveyed authors and reviewers who participated in our onboarding proce...

7594 sym 30 img

Monkeying around with Code and Paying it Forward

19.04.2018

library(tidyverse) library(monkeylearn) This is a story (mostly) about how I started contributing to the rOpenSci package monkeylearn. I can’t promise any life flipturning upside down, but there will be a small discussion about git best practices which is almost as good ?. The tl;dr here is nothing novel but is something I wish I’d experienc...

19235 sym R (6847 sym/10 pcs) 8 img

Lessons Learned from rtika, a Digital Babel Fish

24.04.2018

The Apache Tika parser is like the Babel fish in Douglas Adam’s book, “The Hitchhikers’ Guide to the Galaxy” 1. The Babel fish translates any natural language to any other. Although Tika does not yet translate natural language, it starts to tame the tower of babel of digital document formats. As the Babel fish allowed a person to understa...

12841 sym R (3581 sym/6 pcs)

Rectangling onboarding

25.04.2018

Our onboarding reviews, that ensure that packages contributed by the community undergo a transparent, constructive, non adversarial and open review process, take place in the issue tracker of a GitHub repository. Development of the packages we onboard also takes place in the open, most often in GitHub repositories. Therefore, when wanting to get ...

8274 sym R (8275 sym/10 pcs) 2 tbl

Our package reviews in review: Introducing a 3-post series about software onboarding data

25.04.2018

On March the 17th I had the honor to give a keynote talk about rOpenSci’s package onboarding system at the satRday conference in Cape Town, entitled “Our package reviews in review: introducing and analyzing rOpenSci onboarding system”. You can watch its recording, skim through the corresponding slides or… read this series! What is rOpenSc...

2686 sym

How much work is onboarding?

02.05.2018

Our onboarding process, that ensures that packages contributed by the community undergo a transparent, constructive, non adversarial and open review process, involves a lot of work from many actors: authors, reviewers and editors; but how much work? Managing the effort involved in the peer-review process is a major part of ensuring its sustainabi...

6854 sym R (5154 sym/10 pcs) 14 img